You are here: Gloucestershire Small Schools > Conference > Small Schools Conference Worcester


Report on the Small Schools’ Conference, Worcester Oct. 3rd 2003, Sue Meek, Head Teacher Joys Green Primary.

The speakers, whilst acknowledging the issues facing small schools, concentrated on the benefits. The final speaker implied that he saw small schools as the future as large primary schools face more issues than small schools. It was inspiring to be reminded of what small schools are good at.


Chris Richards considered priorities in the curriculum, the flexibility small schools have in curriculum design and administering that curriculum. He also spoke about the positive benefits of being a small school head.

Carolyn Walker - talked about the sustainable future

Stephen Heppel ( if you ever get a chance to see him - go!) www.ultralab.net


Chris Richards

Considered Priorities in the Curriculum

  • Premier English, Mathematics
  • First Division Science, ICT
  • Second Division PE, Modern foreign Lang., RE
  • Third Division Art & Design, Music, Design &Technology, History, Geography
  • Nationwide Conference Citizenship, PSHE
  • Non League Financial Capability, Enterprise Education, Education for Sustainable Development

He then reminded us of the flexibility we now have in Curriculum design

  • Values and aims
  • Curriculum priorities
  • Additions to the National Curriculum
  • The organisation of the curriculum
  • The distribution across Key stages
  • Curriculum inclusion
  • Curriculum continuity

Depending on the circumstances a school also has some flexibility in Administering the Curriculum

  • The number of teaching hours in the week
  • The length of the lesson
  • The time allocation to each subject
  • The timetable
  • Grouping of the children
  • Deployment of staff

Assessment

  • Optional QCA tests
  • Value added
  • Standardised tests
  • End of unit tests
  • Teacher devised tests
  • Assessment for learning
  • The relative prominence given to test results and teacher assessment in reporting to parents
    Small schools have

Positive influence of the teaching Head - first hand teaching means they are better placed to be able to implement Government initiatives.

  • Good quality medium term planning
  • In depth knowledge of individual children
  • Eclectic pedagogy
  • Flexible patterns of pupil grouping
  • Flexible patterns of staff deployment

Heads of Small Schools are often better placed...

  • To interpret flexibility
  • To point out and rectify the absurdities of target setting
  • Ridicule PANDAS ‘ They should be an endangered species hunted and exterminated!’
  • Combat the influence of performance tables
  • Beguile OFSTED inspectors with their small school ethos.

Carolyn Walker emphasised the importance of children learning life skills such as

  • Problem solving
  • Co-operation
  • Collaboration
  • Decision making

Adults can be frightened by there not being a right answer - probable and preferable future.
Small schools are good at everyone having a say in what happens – responsibilities are shared amongst a few.


Stephen Heppel www.ultralab.net ( if you ever get a chance to see him - go!)

Did you know in the 70’s they built a new school every day? Now one new school is built every 4 days. Schools are diverse. What has been learnt from the 70’s is big isn’t always best. There is down sizing in industry as well because if you are small you are

  • Agile –able to change
  • Able to collaborate easily
  • To communicate effectively
  • To be creative
  • To be part of the community
  • He believes schools belong in the community.
  • Learning continues to become more complex.
  • Education has responded by being more complicated.
  • Small schools won’t survive if they think they can be like they were. They need to respond to changes and get together.
  • He then referred to some of the research carried out by ultralab such as the benefits of music. They found too loud or with lyrics wasn’t beneficial.
  • Do boys work better next to boys? Actually both the boys’ and the girls’ work improved. Engaging the learner, not where they sat, was the important factor.
  • He showed some fascinating work they had done with pupils who had been permanently excluded; providing them with an alternative education that they were ultimately responsible for participating in. Progress was astounding.

We need to consider

  • Pupils mutually mentoring each other.
  • Reaching out beyond the geographical proximities
  • Providing a network for collaboration
  • Don’t confuse standards with standardisation
  • Are we replicating or moving on

Finally they asked people what was a good learning experience for them. It was

  • Doing something practically
  • Making progress and feeling good about it
  • An audience for what they did
  • Collaborating with others
  • Mediation a great leader
  • Delight
  • Passion –teachers who were nutty or eccentric.

I hope these notes do the speakers justice.

PS The food was good! I met people from 8 other counties. So the gossip from lunchtime was also useful.

These notes were made by Sue Meek, Head Teacher Joys Green Primary. head@joysgreen.gloucs.sch.uk